The Case for a Third Reconstruction

The Case for a Third Reconstruction

The scale and depth of the attack on our institutions means that there is no simple way for a pro-democracy coalition to flip the lights back on after Trump. We need transformative thinking.

Just months into Donald Trump’s second term, it’s clear that his administration is transforming our government. The slashing of health and safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP will devastate millions of families. The gutting of regulatory oversight will have equally profound and far-reaching effects: Americans will face more exploitation and harm at work, more consumer fraud, more discrimination, and more exposure to tainted food and climate disaster. Even as government is being dismantled in these domains, in other areas the administration is weaponizing the coercive power of the state in terrifying ways. ICE conducts militarized and lawless immigration enforcement raids across the country, while the Department of Justice and other federal agencies target universities, private firms, and civil society organizations that are seen as hostile to Trump, or too committed to progressive causes.

This slew of policy changes is bound by two features. First, they express and help realize a distinctly reactionary vision of American society. This is not just authoritarianism for its own sake—or for the sake of mere corruption, though there has been plenty of that. The goal is to undo, even preclude, efforts at advancing racial, gender, and economic equality, however modest. Second, this vision of a hierarchical social order is being forged through a parallel effort to remake foundational political institutions. Some institutions, from safety net programs to regulations on corporate pollution and malfeasance, have been dismantled, whether through mass firings or defunding. Other institutions, like ICE, have been supercharged. Still other transformations have converted presidential discretion over policies like tariffs or enforcement decisions into tools of personal rule by fiat, based on little more than Trump’s whims. And while Trump has lost the vast majority of legal cases in district courts, his more sophisticated judicial backers have used technical Supreme Court maneuvers and stretched legal theories to fast-track the administration’s remaking of state and society.

These transformations will have a much deeper impact than any one policy. Agencies ...