In Defense of Norman O. Brown  

Lionel Abel’s “Important Nonsense: Norman 0. Brown” (DISSENT, March-April 1968) proves only that Abel calls “nonsense” anything that won’t squeeze into his preconceptions. Brown’s work just doesn’t fit the squeeze, and so it cannot be fairly described—much less criticized—in Abel’s …









Lionel Abel Replies  

First of all I must grant Art Efron something, for there is one matter on which he is partly right—not really right, not meaningfully right, not even half right—but however pointlessly, he is, in any case, partly right. I make …







History Askew  

Professor Berman’s earlier A Reader’s Guide to Shakespeare’s Plays may have been helpful. I wouldn’t know. His present guide to the intellectual life of the sixties, however, is not of much use. Both title and subtitle are misleading. This is not …














Socialist thought provides us with an imaginative and moral horizon.

For insights and analysis from the longest-running democratic socialist magazine in the United States, sign up for our newsletter: