Dissent Magazine Subscribe to Dissent





print  |  email

Suzanne Nossel Responds

The prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran—bent on regional domination, aggressive toward Israel, and hostile to the United States—is as serious a threat as the United States has confronted in recent decades. For at least two key reasons, that threat will not be directly confronted with force in the short term. First, there are genuine questions about how close Iran is to nuclear weapons capabilities. Estimates differ and are inconclusive. After the intelligence failure in Iraq, standards of proof are high, and policymakers in Washington and in capitals abroad will demand more certainty before taking aggressive action. Second, U.S. military capabilities, regional influence, and diplomatic leverage are effectively reduced by the grinding conflict in Iraq, making the prospect of a second simultaneous conflagration in the Middle East both politically and militarily untenable.

For now, containing the threat posed by Iran will center on diplomatic measures aimed at dissuading the Irani...

» Want to continue? Login below:


Subscriber Login



Subscribers get your account.

Subscribe Now

Access to this article is only offered to print subscribers. Subscribe now to read this article—and get immediate access to our archive—for the price of $20.


top  |  print  |  email